Dickinson imagines what would happen if the shortness of life actually made us feel its sweetness more sharply. In her hands, this isn’t a sentimental thought; it’s a mechanical near-disaster. If we really stood “so deep in joy,” the pure intensity would gum up the works of reason. She pictures our rational mind as a kind of engine, with an odd, hidden belt that keeps us ticking over normally. Too much joy would stop those gears. The speaker isn’t exactly lamenting this — there’s a cool, almost teasing detachment in the way she warns that our sanity depends on not feeling life’s beauty too fully. The mood is paradoxical and lightly unsettling: it suggests that being utterly happy would undo us, and so we’re protected by a necessary dullness. It’s a strange comfort, and very Dickinson in its mix of abstract machinery and enormous feeling.
Did life's penurious length — Summary
Did life's penurious length Italicize its sweetness, The men that daily live Would stand so deep in joy That it would clog the cogs Of that revolving reason Whose esoteric belt Protects our sanity.