«Together we are now...» — Poem analysis

Together we are now... Never longing for each other My weapons, now stashed, In the corners of my mind At the moon we stare, hand in hand Forever in an embrace Up in the clouds, together we stand Never to be separated Are we in love? Is this joy? Yes. We are happy

Show the whole poemHide the poem

Learn Poems app

Try the Learn Poems app

Everything from the website trainer, and more: new exercises, voice recording and sharing, reminders, quick review.

Most love poems announce themselves with fireworks. Cera Brockman's untitled piece, marked only by three asterisks, begins with a hesitation: "Together we are now..." The ellipsis makes the opening sound like someone arriving at a conclusion, or testing whether it is safe to say it aloud. That small tremor sets up the poem's real subject, which is less love itself than the relief of putting something down.

The something appears in the third line: "My weapons, now stashed, / In the corners of my mind." It is the strangest image in the poem and the most revealing. The poem never says what the weapons are, so we have to infer. Judging by the imagery, they seem to be defences, the guardedness a person builds before trusting anyone. Yet they are "stashed," not destroyed. You stash what you might need again, and the corners of the mind are where unwelcome thoughts tend to linger. The happiness here comes with a quiet admission that the old wariness has only been moved out of sight. That makes the calm feel earned rather than naive.

Around this admission the poem builds a picture of stillness. Words of permanence pile up: "Never longing," "Forever in an embrace," "Never to be separated." Together with "together" itself, they share a soft -er ending, so the vocabulary of lasting seems to chime with itself. "Never longing for each other" is a neat phrase, because longing needs distance. To say these two never long is to say the gap has closed.

The central images are the oldest ones in the romantic repertoire: the moon, joined hands, the clouds. The inverted word order in "At the moon we stare" puts the moon first, as if it were the first thing in the speaker's field of vision. "Up in the clouds, together we stand" plays on the idiom of walking on air, with a pleasing impossibility, since nobody can stand on a cloud. A sceptical reader might call these images predictable, and they are. But the poem is not hunting for novelty. It reaches for familiar symbols because the feeling it describes is simple, and the speaker seems to want to claim it rather than decorate it.

In form, the poem is free verse with no stanza breaks and no fixed metre. Most lines carry about three or four stresses, which gives a steady, unhurried pace. There is no rhyme scheme, but there is one true rhyme: "hand" at the end of line five and "stand" at the end of line seven, with "embrace" sitting between them unrhymed. The chime links holding hands to standing together, and the interruption keeps it from sounding too neat. Punctuation is just as sparing. The only full stop in the whole poem comes after a single word.

That word is "Yes," and it is where the poem turns. Up to this point the speaker has made confident statements. Then come two questions, "Are we in love? / Is this joy?", and the confidence wobbles. Someone fully certain would not need to ask. The answer sits alone on its line, short enough to feel like a breath of relief, and answers both questions at once. The poem then closes on its plainest line, "We are happy," with no full stop. After the heightened "joy," the flat, almost childlike "happy" reads as deliberate understatement. Like the opening ellipsis, the missing full stop leaves the moment open, so the poem begins and ends without closure, as though happiness were something still unfolding.

The poem's significance lies in the tension between this simple surface and the buried weapons. Read only for its moon and clouds, it could pass for a greeting card. Read with the third line in mind, it becomes a poem about trust after wariness, in which contentment has to be checked, questioned aloud, and confirmed. Its strength is its restraint: it never explains where the weapons came from or what they were for, and the reader is left to feel how much they once mattered.

Read also