At Rosa Parks Commons — Poem analysis

Arthur JazContemplative

I could have sworn the child was not going to cry when I told her to stop chewing on her fingers and stay close so I can see her but yeah she cried and yeah she screamed and she stood on the equipment of the playground looking like she wanted to hitch a ride out of the park

Was I kidding when I vowed I would be a good dad to my girl (as if I could vanquish all the monsters in the world by snapping my fingers and she would always be able to do everything she wanted to and the world would be perfect and failing that I have to confess that I am not a good father) or is it just that Jackie’s two?

Show the whole poemHide the poem

Learn Poems app

Try the Learn Poems app

Everything from the website trainer, and more: new exercises, voice recording and sharing, reminders, quick review.

A small scene at a playground turns into a trial of the speaker's whole idea of himself. A father tells his daughter to stop chewing her fingers and stay where he can see her. She cries, screams, and climbs onto the equipment "looking like she / wanted to hitch / a ride out of / the park." The second half of the poem steps back from the tantrum to ask a bigger question. Was his vow to be a good dad ever realistic? Or is the real explanation simply "that Jackie's two?" That final question is the poem's central idea. A parent's sense of failure can come from his own impossible standards rather than from anything the child has done.

The form helps create that effect. There is no rhyme and almost no punctuation, and the lines are tiny, often only four or five syllables. Phrases are broken at awkward places: "stay close so / I can see her," "that I / have to confess." The result sounds like someone thinking out loud and trailing from one clause into the next without pausing for breath. The only full stop-like marker is the question mark at the very end, so the whole poem leans toward that question. The casual "but yeah she cried / and yeah she screamed" adds a rueful, shrugging note. He is admitting the obvious while pretending it doesn't sting.

The poem is also full of small echoes. In the first stanza he "could have sworn" she wouldn't cry. In the second he "vowed" to be a good dad. Both are promises or predictions about his daughter's behaviour and his own, and both turn out to be wrong, or possibly wrong. Fingers recur as well. The child chews hers, a nervous, self-soothing habit, and he later imagines "snapping / my fingers" to defeat the world's monsters. One gesture belongs to a frightened toddler and the other to a fantasy of total power. Placed side by side, they show how far his ideal is from what actually happens on the playground.

The hitchhiking image is the most inventive in the first stanza. A tiny child on a climbing frame is recast as a traveller at the roadside with her thumb out, desperate to leave. It is funny, and it also shows how the father reads her distress. He imagines her wanting to escape the park, and, by extension, perhaps escape him. The language is comic and tender at once, and it lets the reader see his hurt without his naming it.

The second stanza grows more elaborate. His fantasy of fatherhood is expressed in grand, almost fairy-tale words: "vanquish," "monsters," a "perfect" world. These clash with the plain, chatty voice around them. Then comes a quiet structural joke. The confession "I am not / a good father" is buried inside parentheses, tucked away as if he'd rather not say it aloud. The logic of that sentence is telling. "Failing that," he says, meaning failing to be all-powerful, he is a bad father. There is no middle ground in his standard, and that is why it crushes him. The poem lets us see this without any lecture.

The child's naming is worth noticing too. In the first stanza she is "the child," a slightly distant, observational phrase. In the second she becomes "my girl," and only in the last line do we learn she is Jackie. The name arrives like a correction. After all the abstract talk of monsters and perfection, the poem ends on one real, specific, small person, and her age is the plain answer waiting beside his heavy self-judgment. The title adds a public frame. A "commons" is shared space, so a private wobble happens where others might see it. The name Rosa Parks carries its own historical weight, though the poem itself never draws on it.

The poem is significant because it takes a very ordinary moment and does not smooth it over. It never tells us whether the speaker is a good father. It keeps the question open, and the humour that surrounds it suggests the doubt is partly self-mockery. Many readers, whether or not they are parents, will recognise the habit of promising too much and then judging oneself by the promise. The poem's quiet suggestion is that love may be better measured by the moment at the playground, when he stays near enough to see her, than by an imaginary power over monsters.

Read also

More by Arthur Jaz

All poems
RomanticArthur Jaz

Anne

beauty truth love all but imperceptible with eyes closed ears plugged