Gallery opening — Poem analysis

Dave BontaAnxious

a congregation at the gallery

we eat and differ in our opinion hands like seeing fires

some talk in which I smell doubt and fear

Show the whole poemHide the poem

Learn Poems app

Try the Learn Poems app

Everything from the website trainer, and more: new exercises, voice recording and sharing, reminders, quick review.

An art opening is supposed to be about looking. Dave Bonta's "Gallery opening" shows a room where the looking has gone sideways: people eat, argue and gesture, and the speaker, who is standing slightly apart, picks up something none of them admit to. The poem's central idea is that behind the polished confidence of a social ritual, people are anxious, and sharp observation can sense it.

The first word that matters is "congregation." Nobody goes to a gallery opening to worship, yet the word turns the room into a church. The people become a faithful gathering, and the art becomes something to be revered. The next stanza strains this idea. "We eat" sounds almost like communion, but the very next phrase, "differ in our opinion," breaks the unity a congregation should have. This is a congregation that disagrees with itself. The poem's final words, "doubt and fear," are the opposite of faith, so the poem moves from a word of belief to a word of unbelief in just six short lines.

The pronouns follow a similar path. The poem begins with a group and says "we" in line three, with the speaker included in the eating and disagreeing. By the last stanza it has narrowed to "I." The speaker does not just join the crowd but separates from it, becoming the one who detects what lies under the talk. The poem does not say whether this is a gift or a burden.

The most puzzling image is "hands like seeing fires." The phrase is ungrammatical, and the poem leaves it that way. It can be read in several ways, and the following are interpretations rather than certainties. The hands may be gesturing as people talk, flaring and flickering like flames. The word "seeing" may turn the hands into eyes, which fits a gallery where visitors are usually told not to touch and so must look with everything else. Or the fires may suggest heat, the way an argument warms up. The line works because it doesn't settle on one meaning. The picture is vivid and restless, and the odd syntax gives the sense of a scene glimpsed in pieces rather than carefully described.

That odd line also sets up the poem's most interesting move, which is the shift between senses. The hands are seen, but the doubt and fear are smelled. A gallery is meant to be a place for the eyes, and the speaker perceives its real mood through the nose. Smell is a primitive, involuntary sense. You cannot choose not to notice it, and it is hard to fake. It is also hard to put into words, which suits an emotion that people in the room are working to hide. The phrase "some talk in which I smell / doubt and fear" suggests that the talk itself, the opinions and the confident chatter, gives off these feelings the way sweat does. People defend their views loudly, and the speaker suspects that the loudness comes from insecurity.

The form supports this. There are three couplets, no end rhyme and no punctuation, and the first line begins in lowercase. The poem has the compression and quiet of something overheard and jotted down. Without rhyme or regular meter, the lines move like speech, and the third line, "we eat and differ in our opinion," is the longest and flattest, almost a shrug of ordinary conversation. The final couplet breaks at an important point. "Smell" sits at the end of a line, and "doubt and fear" arrives only after the pause, so the reader waits for the object of the verb just as the speaker catches the scent before understanding it. The sounds help too. The soft s of "some," "smell" and "seeing" gives a hushed, sniffing quality, and the f of "fires" and "fear" connects the heat of the hands to the emotion beneath it.

What makes the poem significant is how much it does in so little space. It takes a familiar and slightly comic scene, with wine, small talk and opinions about art, and finds an uneasy undercurrent in it without lecturing. It also hints that the people who judge and discuss are exposed in the process. The art on the walls is never mentioned, and the poem is interested in the people who look at it. The reader is left with the impression of a room full of confident voices and one person quietly smelling what they are trying to cover.

Read also

More by Dave Bonta

All poems
ContemplativeDave Bonta

Plea bargain

I hear half a beat of drum to serve time have half a hope in the meantime praise God
DreamyDave Bonta

Cibola 3

I awake in the dark and shake free of sheets & blankets, of down-filled quilt. The rituals of waking– the long, hot shower, the coffee–give
ContemplativeDave Bonta

In good light

On a maple’s pale bark, a zigzag ladder—old tooth-marks from a wandering snail? Green islands of moss