Incommensurable — Poem analysis

Dave BontaContemplative

who but the body could speak about sin

each of us taking on a mistaken beauty

like the name of a god in common letters

Show the whole poemHide the poem

Learn Poems app

Try the Learn Poems app

Everything from the website trainer, and more: new exercises, voice recording and sharing, reminders, quick review.

Nine short lines, no punctuation, and a title that sounds like it belongs in a maths lesson. "Incommensurable" describes things that share no common measure, so that one cannot be used to gauge the other. Dave Bonta's poem sets out to find what in human life is like that, and it ends up with a surprising answer: the body, beauty, sin and the divine all pressed together in one small space.

The poem opens with a question, "who but the body / could speak about sin", though there is no question mark. Without one, the line sounds half like a challenge and half like a flat claim. The sentence suggests that sin is not an abstract idea handed down by doctrine, and that the body is the one witness with firsthand knowledge. Bodies are where desire, shame and guilt actually happen, and they speak in their own way, through a blush or a flinch. The word "speak" gives the flesh a voice that usually belongs to the mind or the soul, so the poem quietly reverses the old hierarchy in which the spirit judges and the body is judged.

The second tercet turns to something that looks unrelated. "Each of us taking on / a mistaken beauty." The phrase "taking on" is slippery. It can mean putting on, like a costume or a role, or shouldering, like a burden. "Mistaken" is slippery too. The beauty may be mistaken because others misread us, or because we ourselves are wrong to claim it, or the beauty itself may be the thing in error. The poem never says which, and the ambiguity seems deliberate. What it does say is that beauty is not simply a gift we possess but something we assume, and it may not fit us. The neighbouring ideas of sin and beauty do not cancel out or explain each other. They sit side by side, and neither can be used to measure the other.

The final image carries the poem's weight: "like the name of a god / in common letters." It is a simile, and a strange one. A god's name is the most charged word a language can hold, yet it is written with the same letters used for "bread" or "door" or "sin." The sacred has to arrive in ordinary material, and the poem proposes that human beings are in the same position. Each person is a holy name spelled in common script. The comparison flatters and unsettles us at once. If we carry something divine, we carry it in the same alphabet as everything else, so it is easy to misread, and perhaps easy to mistake for something else, as in the "mistaken beauty" just above.

The title now looks cleverer. "Commensurable" is built on the idea of measure, and the poem's own word "common" echoes inside it, so that "in common letters" quietly argues with the word "incommensurable." The poem reveals that the divine and the ordinary share a medium, and yet they still cannot be weighed on one scale. The letters are common, but what they spell is not.

The construction supports this. There are three tercets of very short lines, roughly five or six syllables each, and the poem has no rhyme. Instead it relies on small echoes of sound. The short *o* of "body," "god" and "common" ties the first and last stanzas together, framing the middle. The long *a* in "taking," "mistaken" and "name" gives the central image a gentle, repeated chime. Even "sin" and "in" nearly rhyme, an accidental-seeming link that connects the transgression to the phrase "in common letters." Enjambment keeps the reader leaning forward: "taking on" hangs at the end of a line, and "a god" does the same before "in common letters" arrives like an afterthought.

The lack of capitals and punctuation does similar work. Nothing marks where one thought ends and the next begins, so the reader must decide how the body's speech about sin connects to the mistaken beauty. The poem never closes with a full stop either, which suits its subject, since nothing here resolves into a neat equation.

What makes the poem worth reading is how much it holds without insisting on any of it. It offers a question, a puzzling phrase and one image, then lets them work on each other. A reader is left wondering whether sin and holiness are opposites at all, or just two names written in the same common letters.

Read also

More by Dave Bonta

All poems
ContemplativeDave Bonta

Plea bargain

I hear half a beat of drum to serve time have half a hope in the meantime praise God
DreamyDave Bonta

Cibola 3

I awake in the dark and shake free of sheets & blankets, of down-filled quilt. The rituals of waking– the long, hot shower, the coffee–give
ContemplativeDave Bonta

In good light

On a maple’s pale bark, a zigzag ladder—old tooth-marks from a wandering snail? Green islands of moss