Bourgeois' Bauble — Poem analysis

kwirbDreamy

Baubles. Plentiful of such exuberance, our futile playthings: Our idling muses. From our buoyant imaginations useless did we craft our calmer, lesser nuisances. Adults had found these, things, ludicrous, ( lack of logic, form or function, for excuses), but our childish unsophistication refuses to find this alternate gospel humorous.

We galloped on stallions in deserted fields or were they plains of candied grassy lush invigorating our vitally wasteful imaginings? Now, adorned in protective masks and shields, the day breaks: we awaken from our rush, bemoaning the loss of lesser understandings.

Show the whole poemHide the poem

Learn Poems app

Try the Learn Poems app

Everything from the website trainer, and more: new exercises, voice recording and sharing, reminders, quick review.

"Bourgeois' Bauble" begins by dismissing its own subject. Childhood games are "baubles," "futile playthings," "idling muses," "useless." These are the words of people who judge things by what they do. The title sets a quiet trap. A bauble is a showy trinket, and "bourgeois" suggests a settled, respectable world of possessions. The question is whose bauble the poem means, and by the end the answer seems to be the adults'.

The first stanza is knotted on purpose. "From our buoyant imaginations useless did we craft our calmer, lesser nuisances" turns its word order inside out, as if grown-up diction were stiffening around a memory. "Calmer" is a comparison with nothing to compare against. The most natural reading is calmer than the nuisances of adulthood, which makes the childish ones sound almost welcome. Then the speaker stumbles: adults found "these, things, ludicrous." The stray commas read like a hesitation. The parenthesis, "(lack of logic, form or function, for excuses)," shrinks the adults' reasoning to a list of excuses. The stanza ends with "our childish unsophistication refuses / to find this alternate gospel humorous." Play becomes a faith, and the verb is in the present tense. The conviction has not gone away, even if the speaker has grown up.

The sound of the poem supports this. Stanza one rhymes loosely and crowds its line-ends with s-sounds: "muses," "excuses" and "refuses" chime fully, while "exuberance" and "nuisances," like "ludicrous" and "humorous," only echo each other. The effect is a pleasant clutter, like a toy box. Stanza two is far tidier, rhyming ABCABC: fields/shields, lush/rush, imaginings/understandings. The best of these is fields/shields. The rhyme performs the exchange the stanza describes, with open ground traded for protective equipment. The rhythm does something similar. "We galloped on stallions in deserted fields" has a real gallop in it, with stresses falling on every third beat or so. "Now, adorned in protective masks and shields" is clogged with consonants and slows right down.

The imagery of that second stanza is the poem's warmest and least certain. The stallions and "deserted fields" turn mid-sentence into "plains of candied grassy lush," and the speaker admits the doubt: "or were they...?" Memory has blended the real and the imagined, which suits a childhood where the difference hardly mattered. The phrase "vitally wasteful imaginings" holds the whole argument in two words. "Vitally" means both essential and full of life, while "wasteful" is the adult verdict. The poem will not let one cancel the other.

The turn comes with "Now," and the poem's fourteen lines split into eight and six, a shape reminiscent of a sonnet's turn, though the rhyme scheme is not a traditional sonnet's. The word "adorned" is the sharpest choice here. Adornment belongs to ornament, so the grown-ups' masks and shields are decorations too. They are the real baubles, worn for protection and display. "The day breaks: we awaken from our rush" works on two levels. It is dawn, and it is waking from a dream, and "rush" covers both the gallop and the hurry of adult life. The closing phrase, "bemoaning the loss of lesser understandings," brings back the word "lesser" from stanza one. What was once a "lesser nuisance" is now a lost "lesser understanding," and the poem quietly admits that the supposedly smaller thing was worth more than the grown-up gains.

What makes the poem interesting is that it mourns childhood in the language that devalued it. Words like "bauble," "ludicrous" and "nuisances" come from the adult world, and the speaker cannot find a vocabulary for play that is not already a put-down. Some phrasing is stretched ("plentiful of," "candied grassy lush"), and that strain gives the voice an uneasy, out-of-step quality, as if the speaker were trying to remember a language they no longer speak well. The poem leaves the reader asking what counts as useful, and who decided.

Read also