Carl Hamblin — Poem analysis

The press of the Spoon River Clarion was wrecked, And I was tarred and feathered, For publishing this on the day the Anarchists were hanged in Chicago: “I saw a beautiful woman with bandaged eyes Standing on the steps of a marble temple. Great multitudes passed in front of her, Lifting their faces to her imploringly. In her left hand she held a sword. She was brandishing the sword, Sometimes striking a child, again a laborer, Again a slinking woman, again a lunatic. In her right hand she held a scale; Into the scale pieces of gold were tossed By those who dodged the strokes of the sword. A man in a black gown read from a manuscript: “She is no respecter of persons.” Then a youth wearing a red cap Leaped to her side and snatched away the bandage. And lo, the lashes had been eaten away From the oozy eye-lids; The eye-balls were seared with a milky mucus; The madness of a dying soul Was written on her face— But the multitude saw why she wore the bandage.”

Show the whole poemHide the poem

Learn Poems app

Try the Learn Poems app

Everything from the website trainer, and more: new exercises, voice recording and sharing, reminders, quick review.

Edgar Lee Masters published *Spoon River Anthology* in 1915, filling a fictional Illinois graveyard with the voices of ordinary people telling the truth about their lives. “Carl Hamblin” belongs to that chorus, spoken by a small-town newspaper editor who paid a brutal price for printing a political allegory. The poem’s context reaches back to the Haymarket affair: on the day Chicago’s anarchists were hanged in 1887, Hamblin published his vision of justice, and for that his press was wrecked and he was tarred and feathered. Masters wrote decades later, but the memory of labor unrest, radical politics, and mob punishment still clung to the poem.

At the heart of Hamblin’s epitaph is an allegory that strips the blindfold from justice. He describes “a beautiful woman with bandaged eyes” standing on the steps of a marble temple, holding a sword in one hand and a scale in the other. Crowds lift their faces to her, pleading for fairness, but she swings the sword indiscriminately, “sometimes striking a child, again a laborer, again a slinking woman, again a lunatic.” Meanwhile, those quick enough to dodge the blade toss “pieces of gold” into the scale. A man in a black gown reads from a manuscript, “She is no respecter of persons,” a phrase that curdles into irony because the vision shows exactly the opposite: the law protects the rich and strikes the vulnerable. When a youth in a red cap leaps up and snatches away the bandage, the crowd sees decay beneath it—lashes eaten away, eye-balls seared with “a milky mucus,” and “the madness of a dying soul” written on her face. The bandage, it turns out, was never about impartiality. It was hiding something rotten.

Masters builds the poem in free verse, without regular rhyme or meter, so the language moves with the plain, resolute rhythm of speech. The repetition of “again” in the list of the sword’s victims pounds like a series of blows, giving the allegory an almost mechanical ruthlessness. The imagery borrows the familiar props of courthouse statues—marble temple, sword, scale—but makes them grotesque. A blindfold might suggest chosen impartiality, yet Masters says “bandaged eyes,” as if justice is wounded or infected. That choice prepares the poem’s revolting climax, where the “oozy eye-lids” and seared eyeballs replace noble abstraction with disease. Verbs such as “brandishing,” “dodged,” and “snatched” inject violence into the scene, and the red cap marks the youth as a radical, aligning Hamblin’s sympathies with the hanged anarchists. The final line—“But the multitude saw why she wore the bandage”—arrives without exclamation, as if the truth is obvious once someone has the courage to look.

What makes the poem significant is its double critique. It condemns a legal system that dresses up violence and corruption as blind fairness while gold buys influence and the poor take the sword. At the same time, it mourns the fate of the truth-teller in a conformist town. Hamblin is not hanged like the Chicago anarchists, but he is silenced by a mob; his press is destroyed, his body tarred and feathered. The community cannot bear the allegory’s implication, so it attacks the man who printed it. Masters gives him a posthumous voice, letting the dead editor finally explain what the living town refused to hear. That is the method of *Spoon River Anthology*: the graveyard becomes a place where suppressed truths get spoken. Hamblin’s grotesque image of justice—bandaged, decaying, and mad behind the mask—still asks whether the law’s blindness is a virtue or a cover for something diseased.

Read also

More by Edgar Lee Masters

All poems
AngryEdgar Lee Masters

Judge Somers

How does it happen, tell me, That I who was most erudite of lawyers, Who knew Blackstone and Coke Almost by heart, who made the greatest speech
ContemplativeEdgar Lee Masters

Ezra Bartlett

A chaplain in the army, A chaplain in the prisons, An exhorter in Spoon River, Drunk with divinity, Spoon River—
AngryEdgar Lee Masters

Editor Whedon

To be able to see every side of every question; To be on every side, to be everything, to be nothing long; To pervert truth, to ride it for a purpose, To use great feelings and passions of the human family