Out Of Reach — Poem analysis

sunlight pours through the window and its bent blinds, stabbing at my eyes until they're filled with swirls of red and orange. the birds try their best to make blood pool from my ears.

No, I don't want to leave! Please don't wake me up.

the world i've created, painstakingly crafted, dulls. their voices are muddled as reality punches me in the gut.

What did they look like again?

a kaleidoscope dances behind my eyelids and i pull the covers over my head.

We were at the beach. No, the park. And they were saying...

but then the dream disintegrates and floats away in the wind. it's all lost. there's barely a footprint left to haunt my every memory.

"I had this dream earlier." "And?" "I was...I think I was happy."

Show the whole poemHide the poem

Learn Poems app

Try the Learn Poems app

Everything from the website trainer, and more: new exercises, voice recording and sharing, reminders, quick review.

Waking is usually described as a gentle return, but here it is an ambush. Sunlight "pours" and then "stabs," birdsong tries to "make blood pool" from the speaker's ears, and reality finally "punches me in the gut." Everything the waking world offers arrives as a blow. What it takes away is a dream of people whose faces the speaker can no longer picture. The poem is about the helplessness of watching that happen, and about how a happiness you can't remember becomes its own kind of grief.

The title does a lot of work before the first line. An "ancient artifact" is something dug up, fragile, known mostly through fragments, and the subtitle «Out Of Reach» puts it behind glass. The dream is already a relic, and the speaker becomes an archaeologist of the previous hour. The questions that interrupt the poem are acts of excavation: "What did they look like again?" and "We were at the beach. No, the park. And they were saying..." The speaker guesses, corrects the guess, and trails off. The poem never says who "they" are. The fixation on faces and voices suggests people the speaker deeply misses, but that is an inference. Leaving them unnamed lets the loss feel larger than any one explanation.

The poem is free verse, with no rhyme and no steady metre, and that suits a subject that refuses to settle. The line lengths are ragged. The long second line, "stabbing at my eyes until they're filled with swirls of red and orange," runs on like glare. "it's all lost." is short and final. Without rhyme there is no satisfying click of closure, only a loss that keeps happening. The capitalisation also seems to follow a pattern. The narration of waking reality is in lowercase, even the speaker's own "i" ("the world i've created," "i pull the covers"). The pleas and the frantic memory-checks get capitals: "No, I don't want to leave!", "Please don't wake me up." One reading is that lowercase is the drained voice of the ordinary world, while capitals mark sudden spikes of will. The speaker is fully present only when pleading with a morning that won't listen. It is also telling that the speaker says "leave," as if they are the one being removed from the dream rather than the dream slipping away.

The imagery is built on a quiet contrast between violence and fragility. The morning is described in the language of stabbing, bleeding and punching. The dream is described as something "painstakingly crafted" that merely "dulls," "disintegrates" and "floats away in the wind," the vocabulary of dust and ruins. The red and orange swirls behind the speaker's eyelids become "a kaleidoscope," which is a good image for memory. It makes bright patterns from broken pieces and never gives the same picture twice, so it is pretty but useless for recovering a face. The covers pulled over the head are an attempt to protect that darkness, though the poem suggests it is already too late.

The best phrase may be "barely a footprint left to haunt my every memory." It is a paradox: almost nothing remains, yet that almost-nothing haunts. The footprint may also echo the earlier mention of a beach, where footprints are the first thing the tide erases, though the speaker isn't even sure it was a beach.

The ending changes the poem's register completely. Until now we have been inside the speaker's head. Then comes dialogue in quotation marks, the only other voice in the poem. "I had this dream earlier." "And?" The listener's one-word reply is casual and mildly curious, the tone of ordinary morning conversation. The speaker's answer shrinks as it goes: "I was...I think I was happy." The ellipsis is a hesitation, and "I think" hedges even the feeling. The dream's whole emotional weight has been reduced to a guess, a conclusion with no evidence left. The speaker says it aloud and in passing, and the reader knows how much has been left unsaid.

The poem is effective because it takes an experience almost everyone has had, losing a dream on waking, and treats it with the seriousness of bereavement. It offers no consolation and no lesson. It ends on the thin, uncertain word "happy," and that leaves the reader feeling the gap between what was felt and what can be recalled.

Read also

More by Ancient Artifact

All poems
SadAncient Artifact

An Un-Swung Axe

it's not your fault lindo that i flinch every time you suddenly turn around or that my hands shake every time i try to touch your face or that i sob brokenly every time i can't bring myself to do it.
SadAncient Artifact

Replacement

and she's already talking to someone else pretty and funny and full of witty conversation they're just phone calls and text messages but every ring sends an ache in my heart
AngryAncient Artifact

Puppeteer

they stripped me of everything so now i can't help but pull the strings of others