I'm Scared of Shadows — Poem analysis

I was fine. With my thoughts. Untill the triggers you forced upon me came.

I was fine. For I knew, That it'd probably never change, it'd stay the same.

Then it happened. Something bad. That drove that memory down deep into my heart.

Then it happened. Bad memories. And oh like some sort of life "part".

And now I'm no longer there. No longer where? No longer normal.

It's burned, right Into, My heart. Into my mind.

And it's expected to be fine now! Like it's so easy to just move on!

It's somehow my fault, and my dignity's gone...

Mist and dark rooms... Breathing and grabbing. Tying, scratching and losing my mind.

Out in nighttime. Who is that now? I'm scared if I see just my shadow.

Traumatized and you'll never understand! It's not likely to happen but it still can! You let them win, you let them feel better! When the victim is blamed and they start to feel the same...

And now I'm no longer there. No longer where? No longer normal.

It's burned, right Into, My heart. Into my mind.

You won, and you get away- While my body is just left to sway!!

It's done...isn't it? I guess I'll just have to..."move on". That's not how it works. Not when you've left too many scars...

Show the whole poemHide the poem

Learn Poems app

Try the Learn Poems app

Everything from the website trainer, and more: new exercises, voice recording and sharing, reminders, quick review.

"I was fine" is the least trustworthy sentence in Joel Bustos's "I'm Scared of Shadows," and the poem knows it. The speaker says it twice in the opening stanzas, flatly, like a rehearsed answer to a question nobody wants answered honestly. Then comes the turn, "Then it happened," and everything after it shows how a steady self comes apart and why the people around the speaker won't see it.

The poem never says what happened. "Something bad" is as precise as the first half gets, and the vagueness seems deliberate. The speaker can point to the damage but not the event. The later fragments, "Mist and dark rooms... / Breathing and grabbing. / Tying, scratching and losing my mind," read like flashes rather than a story. Judging by the imagery, they suggest a physical attack, but the poem leaves the memory in shards, the way it might present itself to the speaker.

The form does much of the work. Lines are short, often two or three words, and sentences are chopped across them: "I was fine. / With my thoughts." The full stop after "fine" lets the claim stand alone for a moment before the qualification arrives, like someone catching their breath. The same stammer shows in "It's burned, / right Into, / My heart. / Into my mind." The stray capital on "Into" and the staggered lines make the sentence come out in pieces, as if it hurts to finish. This passage returns word for word later, along with "And now I'm no longer there. / No longer where? / No longer normal." Repetition is the poem's main structural strategy, and it carries meaning. The speaker can't leave the memory behind, so the poem can't either, and the refrain loops back like an intrusive thought. The small question "No longer where?" is striking. The speaker asks it, then answers with "normal," a word that names a loss but also a standard someone else has set.

Rhyme is patchy, which suits the subject. "Change" and "same," or "heart" and "part," give a flicker of order early on. Later the rhyme turns bitter: "You won, and you get away- / While my body is just left to sway!!" The near-nursery-rhyme chime clashes with what it says, and "sway" leaves the body passive and adrift while the "you" walks off. Elsewhere the rhymes slip out of reach, and the loose ends feel like the speaker's own struggle to make things line up.

Punctuation also marks the speaker's relationship to other people's language. "Part" and "move on" sit in quotation marks, held at arm's length. The second is clearly someone else's phrase, quoted back with sarcasm: "Like it's so easy to just move on!" It returns near the end, hesitant and trailing: "I guess I'll just have to..."move on"." Then comes the plainest line in the poem, "That's not how it works," with no exclamation mark and no decoration.

The "you" is slippery too. It begins as whoever forced the triggers, then seems to widen to those who expect recovery and blame the victim, and finally to the one who "won" and "gets away." The poem lets these figures blur. My reading is that the speaker experiences the harm and the dismissal as two parts of one injury, which would explain the line "It's somehow my fault, and my dignity's gone..."

The title appears in only one line: "Out in nighttime. / Who is that now? / I'm scared if I see just my shadow." A shadow is the one thing you can never leave behind, and it is your own outline. "Who is that now?" could mean a stranger in the dark, or a self the speaker no longer recognises. Either way, the fear has turned inward.

The poem's significance lies in what it refuses to do. It doesn't explain the trauma, tidy it into a lesson, or offer recovery in the last stanza. It ends on "Not when you've left too many scars...", an unfinished sentence trailing into ellipsis. Its roughness is part of its honesty. It speaks for the second wound that often follows the first, the pressure to be "fine" again on someone else's schedule.

Read also

More by Joel Bustos

All poems
SadJoel Bustos

One Simple Task If All Else Fails.

I have these thoughts and little dreams. All broken, maybe piece by piece. I try to pick them up it seems. Let's figure out a way to make sure they don't fall apart.
RomanticJoel Bustos

Twilight

A scent of calm, forbidden air. As fingers interwine. Unexpected moments are here. A very slight hint of fear.