Bill of Rights — Poem analysis

Kay SageCheerful

Anyone’s glasses are alright if they can see with them; anyone’s pleasures, problems, perfections, or perversities are also O. K. as long as they don’t bother me with them.

Show the whole poemHide the poem

Learn Poems app

Try the Learn Poems app

Everything from the website trainer, and more: new exercises, voice recording and sharing, reminders, quick review.

Few poems announce a grand charter of human freedom and then shrink it to the size of a shrug. "Bill of Rights" does exactly that. Its title promises something solemn, the language of constitutions and legal guarantees, but the poem itself is five lines long and ends with a grumble. The gap between the lofty title and the petty conclusion is where nearly all of its energy comes from.

The poem is about the terms on which we agree to live alongside other people. It begins generously. "Anyone's glasses are alright / if they can see with them" is a reasonable, almost practical principle: a pair of glasses is judged by whether it does its job, not by how it looks or who chose it. The second sentence widens the scope dramatically, from glasses to "pleasures, problems, perfections, or perversities." Suddenly we are not talking about eyewear but about a whole human life, its joys and troubles, its virtues and its oddities. Everyone's version of these things, the speaker declares, is "also O. K." Then comes the final line, which pulls the rug out: "as long as they don't bother me with them." The tolerance on offer has a condition, and the condition is the speaker's own comfort.

That turn is the poem's central idea. The speaker is not exactly intolerant; she grants a startlingly wide freedom, wide enough to include "perversities." But the freedom is hollow if it depends entirely on being kept out of sight. What is being defended is not acceptance of other people but non-interference with oneself. The poem quietly exposes how much of what we call tolerance is really a polite way of saying "leave me alone." There is a dry comedy in this, and also a small, uncomfortable truth.

The construction serves that comedy well. The poem is in free verse, with no regular meter and no rhyme scheme, and this lets the lines move like speech. The first two lines are short and plain, the sort of thing one might say over coffee. Then the third line stretches out, packed with a list of four abstract nouns, and the length itself becomes a joke: the speaker generously piles up category after category of human behavior. Notice, too, how the four nouns begin with the same sound. "Pleasures, problems, perfections, or perversities" is an alliterative run of p's, popping off the tongue one after another. Alliteration usually lends a line a musical, almost celebratory quality, and here it makes the sweeping permission sound breezy and rolling. It also levels everything: "perfections" and "perversities" sit on the same footing, equally "O. K." The mildness of that phrase is worth pausing on. "O. K." is the most casual approval in the language, and writing it with spaced capitals gives it a flat, deadpan finality, like a stamp on a form.

The imagery is minimal, but the single concrete image is carefully chosen. Glasses are about seeing, and the poem's logic turns on who gets to look at what. Glasses are also personal and slightly absurd as a test case: nobody thinks that a stranger's frames are any of their business, so agreeing on this point costs nothing. By starting with something trivial and sliding toward things that really are contentious, the poem lets the reader nod along before noticing how far the speaker has traveled. The key words reward attention too. "Anyone's" appears twice and sounds universal and democratic; "me" arrives only at the very end, and it is the smallest word in the poem doing the most work. After lines of "anyone," the sudden "me" reveals who has been the real measuring stick all along.

The poem matters because it compresses a whole political and social attitude into a handful of lines without announcing a moral. It does not lecture; it simply lets the speaker condemn herself, or perhaps flatter herself, depending on how you read the tone. Is this a sensible rule for coexistence, or a smug one? The poem leaves that question open, and that openness is why it lingers. It also reminds us that a "bill of rights" is, in practice, always a negotiation about where one person's freedom runs into another's. Here that boundary is drawn at the speaker's own nerves, which is both honest and a little funny.

Read also

More by Kay Sage

All poems
CheerfulKay Sage

Credit

Take your chance when it comes your way; take it today, not tomorrow.
ContemplativeKay Sage

Question of Degree

There are some things that when you do not have them you wish you did. And there are some things that
ContemplativeKay Sage

A Small Tree

I took a small tree which had no branches and I transplanted it. I chose richer soil