Why? — Poem analysis

I hate this, I hate that, to be hating, to be the hated. I hate. I hate. And I hate. Why can't I love? It's because I fucking despise. Everthing is un fair. Nothing is fair, it was taken away, but what did I do? I was polite and kind. I wasn't disgusting and firey, Why was I so sweet about it? Why wasn't I Antagonistic?! My mask is just getting thicker. I'm sorry. But Why?

Show the whole poemHide the poem

Learn Poems app

Try the Learn Poems app

Everything from the website trainer, and more: new exercises, voice recording and sharing, reminders, quick review.

Hate is the first word out of the speaker's mouth, and within a single line it has bent into three shapes: "I hate this, I hate that, to be hating, to be the hated." It is a verb, then a gerund, then a passive participle. The speaker is hater and target at once, and the sentence tumbles on without a breath, as if the feeling has outrun the grammar. Kuro Morrow's "Why?" is a short outburst about a particular kind of unfairness: being good and still being hurt, then suspecting that the goodness was part of the problem.

The poem tells us remarkably little about what happened. "It was taken away," the speaker says, but never what "it" is or who took it. That passive phrasing echoes "to be the hated" from the opening line. Things are done to this speaker, and nobody is named as responsible. The poem gives no backstory, so the only honest way to read it is as the shape of a feeling rather than the report of an event.

The rhythm follows that feeling from boil to exhaustion. After the long, stumbling first line comes the clipped "I hate. I hate. And I hate." Here hate has no object at all. It beats like a pulse, and the small "And" before the last repetition sounds worn out, like someone counting. Then comes the poem's most exposed moment: "Why can't I love?" The answer, "It's because I fucking despise," is a closed loop. Hate blocks love, and the only reason offered for the hate is more hate. "Despise" is colder and more formal than "hate," and the swear word shoves it out of the mouth.

There is no rhyme and there are no stanza breaks, which suits a poem that feels untidied. The spelling is loose too. "Everthing" slips, and "un fair" is split in two. This may be haste, or the break may be deliberate, since the word sounds spat out in separate pieces. In either case the page reads like something written in the middle of the emotion rather than after it.

The middle of the poem sets out the speaker's case like evidence. "I was polite and kind" is flat and plain, with no decoration. Then the imagery turns strange: "I wasn't disgusting and firey," followed by "Why was I so sweet about it?" Fire and sweetness are opposites. Fire forces a reaction, and sweetness is something pleasant to be consumed. The speaker seems to believe the world answers heat and ugliness while it overlooks gentleness, and that being sweet meant being swallowed. "Disgusting" is an odd companion to "firey," as though any visible, messy anger would count as a kind of ugliness the speaker refused to show.

The most revealing word is "Antagonistic," with its capital A and its "?!" ending. It is the longest word in a poem of mostly one-syllable bursts. It is also a word from stories, where the antagonist is the character who acts and gets noticed. The speaker wishes to be cast in that role, and the capital letter makes it sound like a costume the speaker wants to put on. The word "Why" gets the same capital at the very end. Both the thing wanted and the thing asked are marked as too big for ordinary lowercase.

Then the poem turns on itself: "My mask is just getting thicker. I'm sorry." The mask suggests politeness as disguise, and "thicker" suggests layers building up each time the sweet response is chosen over the honest one. "Just" makes it sound like a fact the speaker has given up fighting. The sharpest detail is the apology. Having demanded the right to be antagonistic, the speaker immediately says sorry, and that reflex is the mask at work. The poem does not say who the apology is for, which leaves the reader to wonder whether it is aimed at us or at the speaker's own anger.

"But Why?" returns to the title and refuses to close. The "But" suggests the argument has not been settled by any of what came before. The poem is circular. It starts in hatred, passes through grievance and self-reproach, and ends back at the question.

Its significance lies in this honesty. The poem claims no wisdom and offers no consolation. It records a feeling people tend to tidy up before showing anyone, the resentment of being nice, and it shows how swallowed anger can sour into hate that shuts out the love the speaker wants.

Read also